How to Find Passive Voice

by

How to Find Passive Voice

Unearthing the elusive passive voice in your writing is a crucial skill for any compelling communicator. Far from being a mere grammatical nuance, active and passive voice dictate the rhythm, clarity, and impact of your prose. While there are legitimate, strategic uses for the passive voice, its overuse can muddle meaning, obscure responsibility, and diminish the vitality of your message. This comprehensive guide will equip you with the definitive tools and techniques to identify passive constructions with precision, transforming your writing from static to dynamic.

The Core Anatomy of Passive Voice: A Foundation for Detection

Before we delve into intricate detection methods, a solid understanding of the passive voice’s fundamental structure is paramount. At its heart, the passive voice rearranges the typical subject-verb-object order of a sentence. Instead of the subject performing the action, the subject receives the action.

The bedrock of almost every passive construction involves two key components:

  1. A form of “to be”: This is the indispensable auxiliary verb. Think of verbs like is, am, are, was, were, be, being, been. Without one of these, you’re highly unlikely to have a passive sentence.
  2. A past participle: This is the main verb, typically ending in -ed, -en, -t, or an irregular form (e.g., eaten, written, sold, built).

Let’s illustrate:

  • Active: The dog chased the ball. (Subject: dog, performs action: chased)
  • Passive: The ball was chased by the dog. (Subject: ball, receives action: was chased)

Notice how “was” (a form of “to be”) and “chased” (a past participle) combine to form the passive verb phrase. The agent (“by the dog”) becomes optional or relegated to a prepositional phrase. This omission of the agent is a hallmark of many problematic passive constructions.

Method 1: The “To Be” and Past Participle Hunt – Your Primary Scanner

The most straightforward and often most effective method for finding passive voice is to systematically scan your text for combinations of “to be” verbs followed by a past participle. This is your initial, broad-stroke detection mechanism.

Actionable Steps:

  1. Read sentence by sentence. Do not gloss over. Engage with each sentence individually.
  2. Identify all “to be” verbs. Circle, highlight, or mentally note every instance of is, am, are, was, were, be, being, been.
  3. Check the verb immediately following: If the verb immediately after the “to be” verb is a past participle, you’ve likely found a passive construction.

Examples for Practice:

  • Original Sentence: The report was compiled by the committee.
    • Scan: “was” (to be) followed by “compiled” (past participle). Passive.
    • Correction (if desired): The committee compiled the report.
  • Original Sentence: Errors will be made if proper precautions are not taken.
    • Scan: “will be” (to be form – ‘be’) followed by “made” (past participle). Passive.
    • Correction: You will make errors if proper precautions are not taken. (Or: Mistakes will occur…)
  • Original Sentence: The decision is being reviewed by legal counsel.
    • Scan: “is being” (to be form – ‘is’ and ‘being’) followed by “reviewed” (past participle). Passive.
    • Correction: Legal counsel is reviewing the decision.

Crucial Nuance: Distinguishing Passive from Progressive and Adjectival Uses

This method isn’t foolproof on its own, as “to be” verbs also appear in progressive tenses and before predicate adjectives. This is where your grammatical understanding deepens.

  • Progressive Tense (Active): “The dog is barking loudly.”
    • “Is” is a “to be” verb, but “barking” is a present participle (-ing ending), indicating ongoing action, not a passive construction. The dog is doing the barking.
  • Predicate Adjective: “The sky is blue.”
    • “Is” is a “to be” verb, but “blue” is an adjective describing the subject, not a past participle acting as the main verb.
  • Past Participle as Adjective: “The broken vase lay on the floor.”
    • “Broken” is a past participle, but it functions as an adjective describing “vase,” not as part of a verb phrase with a “to be” verb.

By understanding these distinctions, your “to be” and past participle hunt becomes incredibly powerful and accurate. You’re not just looking for word combinations; you’re deciphering grammatical function.

Method 2: The “By (Agent)” Test – Revealing Hidden Actors

Many instances of problematic passive voice occur when the agent (the one performing the action) is omitted or deliberately obscured. The “by (agent)” test forces you to consider if an agent could logically be added to the sentence. If it can, and the sentence remains grammatically sound, you’ve got a passive construction.

Actionable Steps:

  1. Focus on sentences where you suspect passive voice.
  2. Try to insert “by (someone/something)” immediately after the main verb.
  3. If the sentence makes sense and logically implies an omitted agent, it’s passive.

Examples for Practice:

  • Original Sentence: The window was broken.
    • Test: The window “was broken by a baseball.” (Makes sense, implies an agent). Passive.
    • Correction: A baseball broke the window. (Or: Someone broke the window.)
  • Original Sentence: Mistakes were made.
    • Test: Mistakes “were made by John.” (Makes sense, implies an agent, though often intentionally vague). Passive.
    • Correction: John made mistakes. (Or: I/We made mistakes.)
  • Original Sentence: Funding has been approved.
    • Test: Funding “has been approved by the board.” (Makes sense). Passive.
    • Correction: The board has approved funding.

When the “By Agent” Test Fails (and Why):

Sometimes, you can force “by (agent)” into an active sentence, but it will sound nonsensical or grammatically awkward. This is your confirmation that it’s not passive.

  • Original Sentence (Active): The car hit the tree.
    • Test: The car “hit by the tree.” (Doesn’t make sense; the tree didn’t hit the car). Not Passive.

This test is particularly effective for identifying passive voice used to avoid responsibility or when the actor is unknown but implied.

Method 3: Subject-Verb Reorientation – Shifting Perspective

This method involves an intuitive shift in perspective. If you can take the object of a passive sentence and smoothly make it the subject of an active sentence, you confirm the original was passive. This isn’t about identifying the passive form itself, but about confirming its reusability as an active construction.

Actionable Steps:

  1. Identify the “receiver” of the action in the suspect sentence. This is often the grammatical subject of the passive sentence.
  2. Consider who or what is performing the action.
  3. Try to rephrase the sentence with the performer as the subject.

Examples for Practice:

  • Original Sentence: The budget was approved by the finance committee.
    • Receiver: The budget.
    • Performer: The finance committee.
    • Reorientation: The finance committee approved the budget. (Successful reorientation confirms passive).
  • Original Sentence: The email will be sent by Sarah.
    • Receiver: The email.
    • Performer: Sarah.
    • Reorientation: Sarah will send the email. (Successful reorientation confirms passive).

This method is less about direct detection and more about internal verification and conversion. It helps you solidify your understanding of the relationship between active and passive voice and provides a mental shortcut for rewrites.

Method 4: The “Actor” Question – Who’s Doing What?

This method is a conceptual one, less about grammatical rules and more about the fundamental meaning of the sentence. It forces you to ask the crucial question: “Who or what is performing the primary action in this sentence?” If the grammatical subject isn’t the one doing the action, it’s a strong indicator of passive voice.

Actionable Steps:

  1. Locate the main action verb in the sentence.
  2. Ask: “Who or what is performing this action?”
  3. Compare that “who/what” to the grammatical subject of the sentence.
  4. If they don’t match (i.e., the grammatical subject is receiving the action), it’s passive.

Examples for Practice:

  • Original Sentence: The new policy was announced yesterday.
    • Action: Announced.
    • Who/What performed the announcing? (Unstated, but implicitly “the administration,” “the spokesperson,” etc.).
    • Grammatical Subject: The new policy.
    • Comparison: The policy didn’t announce itself. It received the announcement. Passive.
    • Correction: The administration announced the new policy yesterday.
  • Original Sentence: Significant progress has been made on the project.
    • Action: Made (progress).
    • Who/What performed the making? (Unstated, but implicitly “we,” “the team,” “the engineers”).
    • Grammatical Subject: Significant progress.
    • Comparison: Progress doesn’t “make” itself. It received the making. Passive.
    • Correction: We have made significant progress on the project.

This method helps you bypass strict grammatical analysis and jump directly to the core meaning and agency of the sentence, making it an excellent conceptual filter for passive voice.

Method 5: Automated Tools and Their Limitations – Leveraging Technology Wisely

While this guide emphasizes manual detection for a deeper understanding, grammar checkers and writing software often highlight passive voice. Tools like Grammarly, ProWritingAid, and even Microsoft Word have features that flag potential passive constructions.

Actionable Steps:

  1. Utilize your preferred writing software’s grammar check feature.
  2. Review the flagged instances of passive voice.
  3. Crucially, do not blindly accept suggested changes. Apply the manual methods learned above (Methods 1-4) to verify if the flagging is accurate and if an active construction is indeed a better choice.

Limitations to Acknowledge:

  • False Positives: Automated tools sometimes flag legitimate uses of “to be” verbs (e.g., progressive tenses, linking verbs) as passive.
  • Contextual Blindness: They cannot fully grasp your rhetorical intent. Some passive constructions are perfectly acceptable and even preferred for stylistic reasons (e.g., when the actor is unknown, unimportant, or intentionally de-emphasized).
  • Surface-Level Analysis: Tools look for patterns (“to be” + past participle) but don’t always understand the deeper grammatical function or the sentence’s meaning.

Use automated tools as a first pass or a second opinion, never as the sole arbiter of good writing. Your human judgment, informed by the methods in this guide, is always superior.

When to Embrace Passive Voice: Strategic Applications

While the thrust of this guide is detection leading to potential conversion, it’s vital to acknowledge that passive voice isn’t inherently evil. There are specific, strategic instances where its use is not only acceptable but often preferable. Recognizing these scenarios is part of mastering its detection – you learn why it’s there.

  1. When the Actor is Unknown or Irrelevant:
    • Example: “The ancient ruins were discovered in 1820.” (The archaeologist who found them might be unknown or unimportant to the overall context).
  2. When Emphasizing the Action or the Recipient, Not the Actor:
    • Example: “The critical report was published yesterday.” (The focus is on the report’s publication, not necessarily who published it).
    • Example: “The patient was given the wrong medication.” (The focus is on the patient’s experience, not necessarily who administered the medication).
  3. To Maintain Objectivity or Formality (Common in Scientific/Technical Writing):
    • Example: “The experiment was conducted under sterile conditions.” (Emphasizes process over the individual scientists).
    • Example: “Data was collected over a three-month period.”
  4. When Avoiding Responsibility or Softening a Statement (Be Judicious!):
    • Example: “Mistakes were made.” (Politicians often use this to avoid directly assigning blame). While effective for them, be wary of this in your own writing as it can sound evasive.
  5. When There’s a Better Flow or Rhythm to the Sentence:
    • Sometimes, an active construction can sound clunky or disrupt the natural progression of ideas, making a passive sentence the more elegant choice for specific stylistic needs.

By understanding when passive voice is acceptable, your detection efforts become more nuanced. You’re not just identifying it; you’re evaluating its appropriateness.

The Power of Rewriting: Transforming Passive into Active

Once you’ve identified passive voice and determined that an active construction would serve your communication better, the next step is rewriting. This is where your understanding of the core active sentence structure comes into play: Actor + Verb + Receiver.

General Rewriting Strategy:

  1. Find the “to be” verb and the past participle.
  2. Identify the true actor (the “by [agent]” if present, or infer it if omitted). This becomes your new subject.
  3. Change the past participle and “to be” verb into a strong, active verb.
  4. Make the original subject of the passive sentence the object of your new active sentence.

Examples of Transformation:

  • Original Passive: The problem was addressed by the task force.
    • “To be” + past participle: was addressed
    • Actor: the task force
    • Original subject (receiver): the problem
    • Transformed Active: The task force addressed the problem.
  • Original Passive: The new policy will be implemented next quarter. (Actor omitted)
    • “To be” + past participle: will be implemented
    • Actor: (Implied: the company, the department, we)
    • Original subject (receiver): the new policy
    • Transformed Active: The company will implement the new policy next quarter. (Or: We will implement the new policy next quarter.)
  • Original Passive: The concept is understood by most students.
    • “To be” + past participle: is understood
    • Actor: most students
    • Original subject (receiver): the concept
    • Transformed Active: Most students understand the concept.

Practice these transformations. The more you consciously convert passive to active, the more intuitive your detection and rewriting process will become.

The Ultimate Goal: Clarity, Conciseness, and Impact

The extensive effort you put into learning how to find passive voice serves a singular, profound purpose: to enhance the clarity, conciseness, and overall impact of your writing.

  • Clarity: Active voice immediately tells the reader who is doing what, reducing ambiguity and making your message easier to process.
  • Conciseness: Passive constructions often require more words (“was done by” vs. “did”), making your writing less efficient. Eliminating unnecessary passive voice streamlines your prose.
  • Impact: Active voice injects energy and directness into your communication. It makes your writing more engaging, authoritative, and persuasive. When the actor performs the action, the sentence feels alive.

Mastering the detection of passive voice is not about eradicating it entirely but about wielding it intentionally. It’s about making conscious choices that serve your communicative goals. By employing the methods outlined in this definitive guide, you will gain unparalleled control over your prose, transforming your writing into a force that is clear, compelling, and undeniably effective.