How to Create Measurable Learning Outcomes

by

Title: How to Create Measurable Learning Outcomes for Psychology

Introduction: Why Measurable Learning Outcomes Matter in Psychology

In psychology, we strive to understand the complexities of the human mind and behavior. But how do we prove our students have grasped these complex concepts? The answer lies in measurable learning outcomes (MLOs). MLOs are clear, concise statements that define what a student will know or be able to do after completing a course or a specific learning activity. They shift the focus from what an instructor will teach to what a student will learn, providing a roadmap for both teaching and assessment.

For a psychology course, MLOs are particularly crucial. They ensure students don’t just passively absorb information about theories and research but can actively apply psychological principles, analyze data, and critically evaluate studies. This guide will walk you through the process of crafting robust, measurable, and effective learning outcomes specifically tailored for psychology education. We’ll move beyond generic statements and delve into the specifics of what makes a great outcome, using concrete examples you can immediately adapt.

The Foundation: Understanding the Building Blocks of an MLO

A well-crafted learning outcome has three key components: an action verb, the subject content, and the context/condition.

  • Action Verb: This is the most critical part. It’s a verb that describes a specific, observable behavior or skill. It’s what makes the outcome measurable. Instead of vague verbs like “understand” or “know,” we use action verbs from taxonomies like Bloom’s Taxonomy. For example, instead of “students will understand classical conditioning,” a better verb is “students will explain classical conditioning.”

  • Subject Content: This is the specific knowledge, concept, or skill from the psychology curriculum. It answers the question, “What will the student be able to do?” For instance, in our classical conditioning example, the subject content is “classical conditioning.”

  • Context/Condition (Optional but powerful): This adds a layer of specificity. It describes the circumstances under which the student will perform the action. It answers the question, “How or under what conditions will the student perform the action?” For example, “students will explain classical conditioning using a real-world example of a phobia.” This part adds depth and makes the outcome even more robust.

The Verbs: Leveraging Bloom’s Taxonomy for Psychology

Bloom’s Taxonomy is an indispensable tool for crafting MLOs. It categorizes cognitive skills into a hierarchy of increasing complexity, from remembering basic facts to creating new ideas. For a psychology course, you’ll want to use verbs from across the entire spectrum to ensure a well-rounded and challenging curriculum.

1. Remembering (Recall, Define)

At this foundational level, students are recalling basic facts, terms, and concepts. These MLOs are essential for building a knowledge base.

  • Verbs: Define, list, identify, recall, name, state.

  • Psychology Examples:

    • Define the key terms associated with operant conditioning (e.g., positive reinforcement, negative punishment).

    • List the five stages of psychosexual development according to Sigmund Freud.

    • Identify the four lobes of the human brain on a provided diagram.

2. Understanding (Explain, Summarize)

This level goes beyond simple recall. Students are demonstrating comprehension of the meaning of psychological concepts and theories.

  • Verbs: Explain, summarize, describe, interpret, classify, differentiate, recognize.

  • Psychology Examples:

    • Explain the difference between classical and operant conditioning, providing a unique example for each.

    • Summarize the core principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT).

    • Differentiate between the id, ego, and superego in Freud’s theory.

3. Applying (Use, Implement)

This is where the real work begins. Students use their knowledge to solve problems, apply theories, and analyze situations. This is a critical level for a practical field like psychology.

  • Verbs: Apply, use, demonstrate, solve, implement, perform, illustrate.

  • Psychology Examples:

    • Apply the principles of social learning theory to analyze a child’s behavior in a provided case study.

    • Demonstrate how to calculate the mean, median, and mode for a small dataset of psychological research scores.

    • Use the DSM-5 criteria to identify potential symptoms of a major depressive episode in a patient vignette.

4. Analyzing (Break Down, Compare)

At this level, students break down information into its component parts and analyze the relationships between them. They are moving into higher-order thinking.

  • Verbs: Analyze, compare, contrast, distinguish, examine, categorize, infer.

  • Psychology Examples:

    • Analyze the ethical considerations present in a famous psychological study (e.g., the Stanford Prison Experiment).

    • Compare and contrast the key assumptions of the psychodynamic and humanistic perspectives on personality.

    • Examine a research paper’s methodology and identify potential threats to internal validity.

5. Evaluating (Critique, Judge)

Evaluation is about making judgments based on criteria and standards. This is a highly sophisticated skill essential for future researchers and practitioners.

  • Verbs: Evaluate, critique, judge, assess, defend, argue, support.

  • Psychology Examples:

    • Critique the validity and reliability of a given psychological measure (e.g., a personality questionnaire).

    • Evaluate the effectiveness of a specific therapeutic intervention for a particular disorder, based on current research literature.

    • Defend a chosen theoretical perspective on human development using evidence from developmental psychology.

6. Creating (Synthesize, Design)

This is the pinnacle of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Students are synthesizing information to create something new, such as a research hypothesis, a treatment plan, or a study design.

  • Verbs: Create, design, formulate, hypothesize, develop, construct, produce.

  • Psychology Examples:

    • Design a small-scale experimental study to test a hypothesis about the effect of sleep deprivation on short-term memory.

    • Formulate a a novel hypothesis about the relationship between social media use and self-esteem.

    • Develop a basic psychoeducational program outline for a community mental health initiative.

From Theory to Practice: Crafting MLOs for a Psychology Course

Now that we have the building blocks, let’s put it all together by crafting a set of MLOs for a hypothetical introductory psychology course. A good course will have a mix of MLOs from different levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy to ensure a comprehensive learning experience.

Course-Level MLOs

These are broad, overarching statements that define the goals of the entire course. They are typically 5-7 outcomes per course.

  • Students will be able to:
    • Explain the major theoretical perspectives in psychology (e.g., biological, cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic).

    • Analyze psychological research studies to identify their strengths, weaknesses, and ethical considerations.

    • Apply foundational psychological principles to a variety of real-world scenarios.

    • Differentiate between normal and abnormal behavior using standard diagnostic criteria.

    • Communicate psychological concepts and findings clearly and effectively in both written and oral formats.

Unit-Level MLOs

These are more specific outcomes tied to individual units or modules within the course. For example, for a unit on “Social Psychology”:

  • Students will be able to:
    • Define key terms such as conformity, obedience, and social loafing.

    • Summarize the findings of classic social psychology experiments (e.g., Milgram’s obedience study, Asch’s conformity experiment).

    • Explain the factors that influence group dynamics and decision-making.

    • Analyze a news story or a current event using concepts from social psychology (e.g., groupthink, attribution theory).

    • Design a simple research study to investigate a specific social phenomenon.

The Power of “How”: Adding Context and Criteria

To make an MLO truly measurable, you often need to define the criteria for success. This is where the context/condition component becomes invaluable. It answers the question: “How will I know the student has successfully met this outcome?”

  • Unclear MLO: “Students will analyze a research study.”

  • Improved MLO: “Students will analyze a provided psychological research article and write a one-page summary that identifies the hypothesis, methodology, key findings, and a potential limitation.”

  • Even Better MLO (with criteria): “Students will analyze a provided psychological research article and write a one-page summary, following a rubric, that identifies the hypothesis, methodology, key findings, and a potential limitation, achieving a score of 80% or higher.”

The criteria don’t always have to be a specific score. They can also be a specific task or deliverable.

  • Example: “Students will demonstrate an understanding of psychological research methods by designing and presenting a poster for a small-scale study.”

Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Creating MLOs

Crafting effective MLOs can be tricky. Here are some common mistakes to avoid:

  • Using Vague Verbs: As mentioned, avoid “understand,” “know,” “be familiar with,” or “appreciate.” These are not observable or measurable. You can’t see “understanding.” You can, however, see a student explaining a concept or applying it to a new situation.

  • Too Many MLOs: A course with 20+ learning outcomes is likely overwhelming and not truly focused. Aim for 5-7 broad, course-level outcomes and then 2-4 more specific unit-level outcomes. A good rule of thumb is that if an MLO can’t be assessed, it’s not a true MLO.

  • Outcomes That Are Too Narrow or Too Broad: An outcome that is too narrow might be “Students will define the term ‘psychophysics.'” While measurable, this is a very small part of a larger concept. A better outcome would be “Students will explain the principles of psychophysics.” An outcome that is too broad might be “Students will be successful in psychology.” This is an aspirational goal, not a measurable outcome.

  • Focusing on Instructor Behavior: An MLO should describe what the student will do, not what the instructor will do. Avoid statements like “I will teach students about the history of psychology.” A better statement is “Students will describe the major historical schools of thought in psychology.”

  • Confusing Learning Outcomes with Course Activities: Learning outcomes are the goals, while course activities are the path to achieving those goals. A common mistake is to write an outcome like, “Students will participate in class discussions.” This is an activity, not an outcome. A related, and better, outcome might be, “Students will articulate and defend their position on a psychological debate during class discussions.”

Aligning MLOs with Assessment and Instruction

The true power of MLOs comes from their alignment with every other aspect of your course. Your learning outcomes should drive your instructional strategies and your assessment methods. This is known as constructive alignment.

1. Instruction to MLOs

Your lectures, readings, and activities should directly support students in achieving the learning outcomes. If a learning outcome is “Students will analyze the ethical considerations of a study,” your instruction should include a lecture on research ethics, a discussion of the Belmont Report, and a class activity where students review and critique a case study. If your instruction doesn’t prepare students for the outcome, they won’t succeed.

2. Assessment to MLOs

Every single assessment—be it a quiz, a paper, a presentation, or a final exam—should directly measure a learning outcome. This makes your assessments fair, valid, and purposeful.

  • If your MLO is: “Students will define key terms related to cognitive psychology.”

  • A good assessment would be: A multiple-choice quiz with matching terms and definitions.

  • If your MLO is: “Students will analyze the major ethical issues in a historical psychological study.”

  • A good assessment would be: A short essay question asking students to choose a study and discuss its ethical violations.

  • If your MLO is: “Students will design a hypothetical experimental study to test a social psychology phenomenon.”

  • A good assessment would be: A project where students submit a written research proposal, complete with a hypothesis, methodology, and ethical considerations.

Case Study: Rebuilding a Unit on Abnormal Psychology

Let’s apply these principles to a unit on Abnormal Psychology in a typical introductory course.

The Old Approach (Unclear and Unmeasurable)

  • Goal: Students will understand different mental disorders.

  • Activities: Lecture on the DSM-5, a video about schizophrenia, read a chapter on anxiety disorders.

  • Assessment: A multiple-choice test on the chapter content.

This approach is flawed because the goal is vague and the assessment only measures basic recall, not true “understanding.”

The New and Improved Approach (Clear and Measurable)

Here, we’ll create a full set of MLOs and then align our instruction and assessment to them.

Learning Outcomes for the Unit

  • Students will be able to:
    1. Define and differentiate between the various models of psychological abnormality (e.g., biological, psychological, sociocultural).

    2. Describe the key diagnostic criteria for a selection of common mental disorders (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder) using the DSM-5.

    3. Analyze a case study of a fictional client and propose a potential diagnosis and a justification based on the diagnostic criteria.

    4. Compare and contrast the major therapeutic approaches used to treat specific mental health conditions (e.g., CBT for anxiety, psychodynamic therapy for personality disorders).

    5. Evaluate the social and cultural factors that influence the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.

Aligned Instruction

  • To meet MLO #1, the instructor will provide a lecture and a comparison chart of the different models of abnormality.

  • To meet MLO #2, students will read a chapter on the DSM-5 and work in small groups to review the diagnostic criteria for two or three different disorders.

  • To meet MLO #3, the instructor will provide a detailed case study of a client. Students will work in pairs to analyze the case and present their proposed diagnosis and justification to the class. This is a direct application of knowledge.

  • To meet MLO #4, the instructor will present an overview of different therapies. The class will then discuss which therapy might be most effective for a specific disorder.

  • To meet MLO #5, the instructor will lead a discussion or assign a short reading on topics such as the historical stigma of mental illness or cultural variations in symptom presentation.

Aligned Assessment

  • MLO #1 and #2 can be assessed with a combination of short-answer and multiple-choice questions on a quiz. For example, “Briefly explain the key difference between the biological and psychological models of abnormality.”

  • MLO #3 will be assessed through a formal, written case study analysis where students are given a new client vignette and asked to diagnose and justify their choice, citing specific DSM-5 criteria. A rubric will be used to grade this.

  • MLO #4 can be assessed with an essay question on the final exam. For example, “A client presents with symptoms of PTSD. Compare and contrast two different therapeutic approaches that could be used for this client, and argue which one might be more effective and why.”

  • MLO #5 can be assessed through a reflection paper or a presentation on a specific cultural or social issue in mental health.

By following this process, we’ve created a cohesive, purposeful, and highly effective learning experience where every element is intentionally designed to help students achieve specific, measurable outcomes. The old, vague goal of “understanding” has been replaced with concrete, observable actions that truly demonstrate mastery of the material.