How to Eliminate Passive Voice

by

The hum of effective communication often relies on a fundamental principle: clarity. And a silent saboteur of clarity, lurking in the shadows of many a sentence, is the passive voice. It obscures agency, dilutes impact, and can leave your reader wondering who did what to whom. This isn’t about avoiding passive constructions entirely; sometimes, they’re necessary. This is about strategic elimination – identifying instances where the passive voice weakens your message and transforming them into potent, active statements. Mastering this skill isn’t merely a grammatical exercise; it’s a profound upgrade to your writing, making it more direct, engaging, and persuasive.

This comprehensive guide will arm you with the tools and understanding to confidently dismantle passive constructions, sentence by sentence. We’ll delve beyond the superficial, exploring the nuances of active voice and providing actionable strategies you can immediately apply. Prepare to transform your writing from convoluted to compelling.

The Linguistic Shroud: Understanding Passive Voice

Before we can eliminate it, we must truly understand it. The passive voice occurs when the subject of the sentence is the recipient of the action, rather than the performer. The action is performed on the subject. The typical structure involves a form of the verb “to be” (is, am, are, was, were, be, being, been) followed by the past participle of the main verb. Often, but not always, the doer of the action is introduced by the preposition “by.”

Passive Example: The ball was thrown by the boy.
Active Equivalent: The boy threw the ball.

In the passive example, “the ball” is the subject, but it didn’t throw anything; it was thrown. The actual performer of the action, “the boy,” is relegated to a prepositional phrase, or sometimes, vanishes entirely. This loss of direct agency is the core problem.

Identifying the Passive Voice: Your Diagnostic Toolkit

Spotting passive voice isn’t always as simple as looking for “by [doer].” Many times, the agent is completely omitted, making identification slightly more subtle.

Key Indicators:

  1. Form of “to Be” + Past Participle: This is your primary flag.
    • is decided (present passive)
    • was reviewed (past passive)
    • will be created (future passive)
    • has been observed (present perfect passive)
  2. The “By [Doer]” Test: If you can logically insert “by [someone/something]” after the main verb and the sentence still makes sense, it’s likely passive. Even if the “by” phrase isn’t present, this test helps confirm the structure.
    • The decision was made. (Can you say “The decision was made by the committee?” Yes. Passive.)
    • The report was submitted. (Can you say “The report was submitted by the team?” Yes. Passive.)
  3. Subject as Receiver of Action: The core concept. Who or what is doing the verbing? If the subject isn’t doing it, it’s passive.
    • The building was damaged. (The building didn’t damage anything; it received damage. Passive.)
    • Mistakes were made. (Mistakes didn’t make anything; they were made. Passive.)

The Perils of Passivity: Why It Matters

Understanding how to identify passive voice is only half the battle. Comprehending why it’s often detrimental propels you toward motivated elimination.

  1. Obscures Agency/Responsibility: When the doer is omitted or minimized, accountability becomes hazy.
    • Passive: Mistakes were made. (Who made them?)
    • Active: I made mistakes. (Clear responsibility.)
  2. Reduces Clarity and Directness: Extra words are often needed, making sentences longer and less punchy. The message takes a circuitous route.
    • Passive: The discovery was made by Dr. Evans last year.
    • Active: Dr. Evans made the discovery last year.
  3. Weakens Impact: Active voice is inherently more dynamic and forceful. It breathes life into your prose.
    • Passive: Solutions are being sought. (Sounds tentative, ongoing, distant.)
    • Active: We are seeking solutions. (Direct, proactive, engaged.)
  4. Increases Word Count: Passive constructions frequently inflate sentence length without adding meaning. This wastes your reader’s time and attention.
    • Passive: It was decided by the committee that the new policy would be implemented. (13 words)
    • Active: The committee decided to implement the new policy. (8 words)
  5. Creates Distance/Impersonality: In professional contexts, this can be an asset when appropriate (e.g., scientific writing focusing on the experiment, not the experimenter). However, in most business or persuasive writing, it feels detached.
    • Passive: The project will be completed by the deadline. (Sounds like it will happen by magic.)
    • Active: We will complete the project by the deadline. (Commitment, effort.)

The Transformation Blueprint: Strategies for Elimination

Now that we understand the enemy, let’s learn how to conquer it. The core principle of eliminating passive voice is simple: identify the hidden (or explicit) agent and make it the subject of your sentence.

Strategy 1: Find the Agent and Make it the Subject

This is the most common and effective method.

Steps:

  1. Identify the passive construction (form of “to be” + past participle).
  2. Ask yourself: “Who or what is performing this action?”
  3. Take that “who” or “what” and move it to the beginning of the sentence, making it the new subject.
  4. Re-verb the sentence using an active verb.

Examples:

  • Passive: The report was written by Emily.
    • Who wrote the report? Emily.
    • Active: Emily wrote the report.
  • Passive: The meeting was canceled due to unforeseen circumstances. (No “by” phrase, but the “by [doer]” test works: “was canceled by whom/what?”)
    • Who canceled the meeting? (Implied: the organizers, management, circumstances.) Let’s assume “management.”
    • Active: Management canceled the meeting due to unforeseen circumstances.
  • Passive: New regulations are being considered by the board.
    • Who is considering the regulations? The board.
    • Active: The board is considering new regulations.

Strategy 2: Infer the Agent When Missing

Sometimes, the doer is implied or generally understood but not explicitly stated. You’ll need to use context clues to determine the most logical agent. If no precise agent exists or is relevant, consider a general subject like “we,” “they,” “researchers,” “the company,” or even “people.”

Examples:

  • Passive: The problem was addressed promptly.
    • Who addressed the problem? (Implied: we, the team, the staff.) Let’s use “We.”
    • Active: We addressed the problem promptly.
  • Passive: Significant progress has been made on the project.
    • Who made the progress? (Implied: the team, the developers, the researchers.) Let’s use “The team.”
    • Active: The team has made significant progress on the project.
  • Passive: Payments are expected by the end of the month.
    • Who expects payments? (Implied: the company, we, the billing department.) Let’s use “We.”
    • Active: We expect payments by the end of the month.

Strategy 3: Change the Verb

In some cases, simply finding the agent isn’t enough, or the original verb doesn’t quite fit the active voice transformation. You might need to select a more active, decisive verb.

Examples:

  • Passive: A significant impact was had by the new policy. (Awkward phrasing)
    • Who had the impact? The new policy.
    • Active (with stronger verb): The new policy significantly impacted [something/someone]. (Or “The new policy made a significant impact.”)
  • Passive: The solution was arrived at after much deliberation.
    • Who arrived at the solution? (Implied: we, the team, the committee.)
    • Active (with stronger verb): We derived the solution after much deliberation. (Or “We reached the solution…”)
  • Passive: Care should be taken when handling hazardous materials.
    • Who should take care? (Implied: you, workers.)
    • Active (idiomatic, stronger verb): You should exercise caution when handling hazardous materials. (Or “Handle hazardous materials with care.”)

Strategy 4: Rephrase the Entire Sentence (When Necessary)

Sometimes, a sentence is so convoluted by passive constructions that a direct transformation feels clunky. In these instances, step back and rephrase the entire idea, focusing on expressing the core action directly.

Examples:

  • Passive: It was decided by management that employees would be required to attend the training, which would be provided to them in the upcoming quarter.
    • This is a mess of passives.
    • Active Rephrase: Management decided employees must attend the training we will provide next quarter. (Much cleaner, more direct, fewer words.)
  • Passive: The purpose of the study was to see if an improvement could be demonstrated regarding patient outcomes.
    • Active Rephrase: The study aimed to demonstrate improved patient outcomes. (Or “The study sought to improve patient outcomes.”)

Strategy 5: Merge Sentences for Greater Impact

Sometimes, a passive construction exists because a previous sentence already established the agent, and the writer feared redundancy. Often, combining these sentences or restructuring them can lead to a more concise and active flow.

Examples:

  • Original: The researcher conducted several experiments. The data was then analyzed.
    • Here, “the data was analyzed” is passive. Who analyzed it? The researcher.
    • Active Merge: The researcher conducted several experiments, then analyzed the data.
  • Original: A new security protocol was implemented. This was done to protect sensitive information.
    • Active Merge: We implemented a new security protocol to protect sensitive information.

Advanced Considerations: When Passive Voice is Acceptable (or Even Preferred)

While the goal is strategic elimination, it’s crucial to understand that passive voice isn’t inherently evil. There are specific, valid reasons to use it. Knowing these exceptions prevents overcorrection and allows for nuanced, expert-level writing.

  1. When the Doer is Unknown or Irrelevant:
    • Example: My car was stolen last night. (You don’t know who stole it, or it’s not important to the immediate point.)
    • Example: The pyramids were built over many centuries. (The precise builders are not the focus; the act of building is.)
  2. To Emphasize the Action or the Recipient of the Action: When the object of the action is truly the most important element of the sentence.
    • Example: President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. (The focus is on the unfortunate fate of Kennedy, not the assassin.)
    • Example: The first democratic elections were held in South Africa in 1994. (The holding of elections is the historical event, not who held them.)
  3. To Avoid Blaming or Assigning Responsibility (Tactful Omission): Useful for diplomatic language, especially in negative contexts.
    • Example: Mistakes were made. (Softer than “I made mistakes” when responsibility is shared or delicate.)
    • Example: The error was discovered in the final review. (Rather than “The team discovered the error,” which might imply blame.)
  4. In Scientific or Technical Writing (Focus on Objectivity): Often used to maintain objectivity and focus on processes or findings, rather than the researchers themselves.
    • Example: The solution was heated to 100 degrees Celsius. (The action and its effect are paramount, not the person heating it.)
    • Example: Results were observed after three trials. (Focuses on the data.)
    • Caveat: Even in scientific writing, many style guides now encourage more active voice for clearer communication, especially in discussion sections. Don’t assume all scientific writing must be passive.
  5. When an Active Construction Would Be Awkward or Clunky: Sometimes, forcing an active voice creates an unnatural sentence.
    • Slightly awkward active: The widespread adoption of renewable energy sources will lead to lower carbon emissions. (Okay, but a touch long.)
    • Acceptable passive: Lower carbon emissions will be achieved through the widespread adoption of renewable energy sources. (Here, the passive feels natural and emphasizes the outcome.)

The “Strategic Passive” Mindset

The goal is not to eradicate every instance of passive voice. It’s to be intentional about its use. When you write a passive sentence, ask yourself:

  • Is the doer truly unknown or irrelevant?
  • Am I trying to emphasize the recipient of the action?
  • Am I trying to be tactful or objective?
  • Would an active construction be genuinely awkward?

If the answer to any of these is “yes,” then your passive construction might be a legitimate stylistic choice. If not, activate it.

Practical Application: Implementing Active Voice in Your Writing Workflow

Knowledge without application is inert. Integrate active voice principles into your writing process, not just as a post-draft edit.

During Drafting: Proactive Activation

  1. Thinking Actively: Before you write a sentence, consider who or what is performing the main action. Start your sentence with that agent.
    • Instead of: “It was decided that…” (Passive)
    • Think: “Who decided?” -> “The committee decided…” (Active)
  2. Subject-Verb Agreement First: Focus on getting your subject and main verb right at the outset. Ensure the subject is actively performing that verb.

  3. Verb Choice: Choose strong, descriptive verbs. Weak verbs (like forms of “to be”) often precede passive constructions.

    • Instead of: “The information is being provided to the team.” (Passive)
    • Think: “We are providing the information to the team.” (Stronger verb, active.)

During Editing: Targeted Elimination

  1. The “Find All Forms of ‘To Be'” Scan: Use your word processor’s search function (Ctrl+F or Cmd+F) to find “is,” “was,” “were,” “are,” “be,” “being,” “been,” “had been,” “has been,” etc. Don’t change them all, but examine each instance. If it’s followed by a past participle, it’s a potential passive construction.

  2. The “By [Doer]” Test Revisited: Mentally insert “by a person/thing” after any verb + form of “to be” pairing. If it makes sense, it’s likely passive.

  3. Read Aloud: This is a powerful technique. Passive sentences often sound clunky, indirect, or overly formal when spoken. Active sentences typically flow more naturally.

  4. Focus on the “Who” or “What”: For every sentence, ask yourself: “Who is doing what?” If the “who” or “what” is buried, bring it to the forefront.

Beyond Grammar: The Rhetorical Power of Active Voice

The benefits of active voice extend beyond grammatical correctness. They deeply influence how your message is received.

Enhancing Persuasion

  • Clarity and Authority: When you state who is responsible for an action, you project confidence and authority. “We will deliver the product” is more convincing than “The product will be delivered.”
  • Direct Calls to Action: Active voice facilitates clear instructions and persuasive appeals. “You must complete the form” is more impactful than “The form must be completed.”

Boosting Engagement

  • Narrative Drive: Stories, reports, and arguments are more engaging when they feature clear actors performing actions. “The protagonist faced a formidable enemy” is more compelling than “A formidable enemy was faced by the protagonist.”
  • Conciseness: Fewer words mean faster processing for the reader, maintaining their attention. Efficient communication is engaging communication.

Professionalism and Credibility

  • Precision: Active voice eliminates ambiguity, a hallmark of professional communication. There’s no doubt about who is accountable.
  • Ownership: Taking ownership of actions, whether successes or failures, builds trust and credibility. “I made a mistake” (active) breeds more trust than “A mistake was made” (passive).

Final Thoughts on Active Voice Mastery

Eliminating passive voice isn’t a stylistic quirk; it’s a fundamental shift in how you conceive and construct your sentences. It’s about empowering your subjects, clarifying your message, and injecting dynamism into your prose. This guide has equipped you with the diagnostic tools, the transformation blueprints, and the understanding of when to wield the passive voice intentionally.

Make the commitment to actively scrutinize your writing. Challenge every “is,” “was,” and “were.” Ask yourself: “Who is doing this?” By consistently applying these strategies, your writing will become sharper, more direct, more engaging, and undeniably more powerful. The transformation won’t happen overnight, but with conscious effort and practice, your voice will find its full, active potential.