How to Work with a Copyeditor

by

The blinking cursor on a finished manuscript can feel like the triumphant flag planted on Mount Everest. You’ve poured yourself onto the page, wrestled with structure, honed your arguments, and polished your prose. But the summit, while glorious, often reveals another peak in the distance: the copyedit. Far from a mere spell-check, the copyedit is a crucial, sophisticated, and often transformative stage in the publishing process. It’s where your brilliant ideas are meticulously groomed for clarity, consistency, and ultimately, an effortless reading experience for your audience.

For many writers, particularly those new to professional publishing, the copyediting phase can feel like a black box. How do you prepare? What should you expect? How do you best collaborate to ensure the editor enhances, rather than alters, your unique voice? This definitive guide dissects the entire lifecycle of working with a copyeditor, offering concrete strategies and actionable advice to empower you to navigate this essential partnership with confidence and achieve the best possible outcome for your work. Prepare to demystify the copyedit and learn how to leverage this invaluable service to elevate your writing from good to exceptional.

Understanding the Copyeditor’s Role: More Than Just Grammar

Before you even think about sending your manuscript, it’s vital to grasp the profound difference between a proofreader, a substantive editor, and a copyeditor. Confusing these roles can lead to communication breakdowns and unmet expectations.

  • Substantive/Developmental Editor: This editor works on the big picture – plot, character development, pacing, argument structure, overall flow. They may suggest major reorganizations, rewrites of entire sections, or even call for significant cuts. This happens before copyediting.
  • Copyeditor: This is where we focus. A copyeditor refines your manuscript at the sentence and paragraph level. Their primary goal is to ensure your text is clear, correct, consistent, and concise. Think of them as the meticulous guardians of readability. They address grammar, spelling, punctuation, syntax, word choice, factual accuracy (often basic checks, not deep research), style consistency (adhering to a style guide like Chicago, AP, or a client-specific one), and sometimes light formatting. They aim to make your writing sing, without changing your voice.
  • Proofreader: The final set of eyes, typically on layout proofs (PDFs, mockups), looking only for stray typos, missing punctuation, awkward line breaks, or other minor errors that slipped through previous stages. This happens after copyediting and typesetting.

Understanding this hierarchy prevents writers from expecting a copyeditor to restructure an entire chapter or, conversely, to catch a single missed comma after the print button has been pressed. Your copyeditor’s expertise lies in the nuanced execution of language.

Concrete Example: You’ve written, “The individual, who was quite old, ambled slowly down the path.” A substantive editor might ask, “Does ‘individual’ add anything beyond ‘man’ or ‘woman’ if that information is known?” A copyeditor would refine it to, “The old man ambled slowly down the path,” (for conciseness and stronger noun) or ensure consistent hyphenation if you use “old-fashioned” elsewhere. A proofreader would check for a missing period at the end.

Preparing Your Manuscript for Submission: The Pre-Game Warm-Up

A well-prepared manuscript is a testament to professionalism and saves time and money. It also demonstrates respect for your copyeditor’s process, allowing them to focus on true linguistic issues rather than wrestling with formatting inconsistencies.

  1. Run Your Own Basic Checks: Before sending, perform a thorough self-review. This isn’t copyediting; it’s cleaning up the obvious.
    • Spell Check & Grammar Check: Use your word processor’s tools. They aren’t perfect, but they catch a significant chunk of errors. Don’t rely solely on them, but use them as a first pass.
    • Read Aloud: This is incredibly effective for catching awkward phrasing, run-on sentences, and repetitive words. Your ear will often pick up what your eye misses.
    • Search for Common Errors: Do you habitually use “their” for “there,” or “it’s” for “its”? Do a search for your personal linguistic quirks. (Pro tip: Search for “would of” to catch “would have” errors).
    • Check Names and Factual Consistency: If your protagonist is named “Eleanor” on page 5 and “Eleonora” on page 200, fix it. If a character has blue eyes in chapter 1 and green in chapter 10, decide which is correct. While a copyeditor might catch these, it’s primarily your responsibility.
  2. Ensure Consistent Formatting: This is paramount.
    • File Format: Typically Microsoft Word (.docx) is preferred, as it allows for Track Changes.
    • Font and Font Size: Use a standard, readable font like Times New Roman or Calibri, 12pt. Don’t use fancy, decorative fonts.
    • Line Spacing: Double-space the entire document. This provides ample room for editor comments and readability.
    • Margins: Standard 1-inch margins all around.
    • Page Numbers: Include them, typically in the top or bottom right corner.
    • Headers: If you use them, ensure consistency (e.g., all H1s are identical in style, all H2s are identical).
    • Paragraph Indentation: Stick to one method – either a standard first-line indent or a full line break between paragraphs, but not both. (Most fiction uses indents, most non-fiction uses line breaks).
    • Chapter/Section Breaks: Use clear, consistent breaks. For new chapters, use a page break.

Concrete Example: Instead of sending a document with random bolding, inconsistent heading sizes, and some paragraphs indented while others aren’t, create a clean file. Use Word’s built-in heading styles (e.g., Heading 1, Heading 2), ensure every paragraph has a uniform indent, and apply double-spacing globally. This clarity allows your editor to immediately dive into the language, not wrestle with your document’s basic structure.

The Initial Exchange: Setting the Stage for Success

This phase is about clear communication, establishing expectations, and providing your copyeditor with all the necessary tools to do their best work.

  1. Provide a Concise Overview: Briefly explain the project. Is it a novel? A memoir? A technical report? Who is the target audience? What is the overall tone you’re aiming for?
  2. Share Your Goals and Concerns:
    • What are you hoping the copyedit achieves? (e.g., “I know my commas are a mess,” or “I want to ensure a consistent narrative voice.”)
    • Are there specific areas you’re worried about? (e.g., “I tend to overuse passive voice,” or “I’m not sure if my dialogue tags are repetitive.”)
    • Are there any sensitive topics or areas where you need particular care? (e.g., “I want to ensure all LGBTQ+ terminology is modern and respectful.”)
  3. Establish a Style Guide (or discuss creating one): This is arguably the most crucial piece of information you can provide.
    • Pre-existing Style Guides: If you’re publishing with a traditional publisher, they will likely have their own house style guide (e.g., Penguin Random House Chicago Manual of Style guidelines). Provide this.
    • Industry-Standard Style Guides: For most North American non-fiction and literary fiction, The Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS) is the standard. For journalism and related fields, The Associated Press Stylebook (AP) is common. Academic fields have their own (APA, MLA, AMA, etc.). State which one you prefer or which is standard for your genre/audience.
    • Custom Style Sheet (or “Style Sheet in Progress”): If no official style guide is in play, you and your copyeditor will establish one. This document, often created by the copyeditor, will track all your specific preferences and project-specific decisions. This includes:
      • Specific spellings: (e.g., “acknowledgement” vs. “acknowledgment”; “website” vs. “web site”)
      • Capitalization rules: (e.g., “earth” vs. “Earth”; “President” vs. “president”)
      • Hyphenation policy: (e.g., “well-being” vs. “wellbeing”)
      • Numbers: (e.g., “twenty-five” vs. “25”; “10 a.m.” vs. “10 AM”)
      • Treatment of foreign words, jargon, or proper nouns.
      • Punctuation preferences: (e.g., single vs. double quotes for dialogue; Oxford comma preference).
      • Voice and Tone notes: (e.g., “Maintain a formal, academic tone,” or “Keep it conversational.”)

Concrete Example: Instead of sending a manuscript with a vague note like, “Just make it good,” provide specific instructions. “This is a historical fiction novel set in 18th-century France. I want to maintain a slightly formal, evocative tone. Please use The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition, for general guidance. I’m especially concerned about comma splices and sentence fragments. Also, be aware that I deliberately use some archaic spellings for period flavor, but please flag anything that seems truly inconsistent or confusing.” You then discuss the archaic spellings, and the copyeditor will note those specific instances in the style sheet.

During the Copyedit: Respecting the Process

Once the manuscript is in the copyeditor’s hands, a period of trust and patience begins. Avoid the temptation to bombard them with questions or new edits.

  1. Resist the Urge to Send Updates/Changes: This is a crucial point. Once your manuscript is with the copyeditor, do not make further changes on your end and send them new versions. This creates version control nightmares, introduces new errors, and wastes everyone’s time. If a critical update is absolutely necessary, communicate it clearly and understand it may lead to additional charges or delays.
  2. Understand the Tools: Track Changes and Comments: Professional copyeditors primarily use Microsoft Word’s “Track Changes” feature.
    • Track Changes: This shows every insertion, deletion, and formatting change the editor makes. It’s essentially a redline version of your manuscript.
    • Comments: The editor will use the “Comments” feature (often appearing in a balloon on the right margin) to:
      • Explain a change: “Conciseness: removed redundant adjective.”
      • Query a fact: “Is this date correct? Wikipedia states [X].”
      • Suggest an alternative: “Consider rephrasing this sentence for flow.”
      • Flag an inconsistency: “Character’s eye color changed from blue to green here. Please confirm.”
      • Ask for clarification: “Meaning unclear – can you rephrase?”
      • Point out a larger issue: “Repeated misuse of ‘affect’/’effect’ throughout. Please review rules.”

Concrete Example: Your editor might change “He ran quickly across the field” to “He sprinted across the field.” The Track Change would show “ran quickly” deleted and “sprinted” inserted. A comment might accompany it: “Conciseness/stronger verb.” Or, they might highlight a sentence: “The dog, which was brown, barked.” and add a comment: “Suggest removing ‘which was brown’ if the dog’s color isn’t vital to the plot, or rephrasing to ‘The brown dog barked’ if it is. Consider conciseness.”

The Return of the Manuscript: Your Crucial Review

This is your moment to interact with the copyedit. Approach it systematically and professionally.

  1. Schedule Dedicated Time: This isn’t a quick skim. You need focused, uninterrupted time to review every change and comment. Rushing this stage breeds errors.
  2. Review the Style Sheet First: Before diving into the manuscript, carefully read the editor’s compiled style sheet. This document is invaluable for understanding the decisions made and preparing you for what you’ll see in the manuscript. It’s also your guide for future writing projects.
  3. Methodically Review Every Change (and Respond to Queries):
    • Go through the document change by change: In Word, use the “Next” and “Previous” buttons in the Review tab to navigate efficiently.
    • Accept or Reject Wisely:
      • Accept: If you agree with the change, accept it. This is the default.
      • Reject: If you disagree, reject the change. Critically important: If you reject a copyeditor’s change, always make a conscious decision to do so. Don’t reject out of habit or a feeling of ownership; reject because you have a specific, well-reasoned objection rooted in your intent or voice.
      • Modify (and leave a note): Sometimes you’ll accept part of a change but want to tweak it further, or you’ll reject a change but still think the original sentence needs work. Make your modification, and if it’s significant, add a comment explaining your reasoning.
    • Address Every Comment/Query: This is where the true collaboration happens.
      • Answer direct questions: (e.g., “Yes, the date is correct,” or “No, character’s eyes are green.”)
      • Provide clarification: If the editor found a passage unclear, rewrite it to be clearer.
      • Discuss disagreements: If you fundamentally disagree with a suggestion in a comment, respond directly in the comment thread. Explain your reasoning. Do not simply delete the comment without a response if it’s a query requiring your input. This leaves the editor guessing.
      • Resolve all comments: Aim to resolve every single comment (mark as resolved or delete after you’ve actioned it) before sending the manuscript back. This provides a clean slate for the next stage.
  4. Confirm Consistency Post-Review: After you’ve accepted/rejected changes and addressed queries, quickly scan for any new inconsistencies you might have introduced during your review process.
  5. Maintain Your Voice: A good copyeditor will respect your voice. If a change feels like it fundamentally alters your unique style or tone, question it. But be open to the possibility that the change enhances clarity without stifling your voice. Often, what feels like “your voice” is actually an unrefined habit that obscures meaning.

Concrete Example (Handling Queries):

  • Editor Comment: “Query: Is ‘flibbertigibbet’ the exact term you want here, given the technical nature of the report? Consider ‘frivolous’ or ‘irresponsible person’.”
  • Your Response 1 (Accept with modification): You add a new comment: “Good point. I’ll change it to ‘irresponsible individual’ for formality, but I want to keep the playful tone, so ‘flibbertigibbet’ is a bit too much swing.”
  • Your Response 2 (Reject with explanation): You add a new comment: “I appreciate the suggestion, but ‘flibbertigibbet’ is intentionally used here to juxtapose the technical language and subtly inject humor, which is part of the intended audience experience.”

The key is communication. Don’t just alter silent.

The Second Pass (Optional, But Often Recommended): Final Polish

Depending on the complexity of your manuscript and the number of changes, your copyeditor may offer a “second pass” or “author’s review” of your reconciled version. This is typically a lighter review focusing on ensuring you’ve addressed all queries, haven’t introduced new errors, and all accepted changes integrate seamlessly.

  1. Understand the Scope: A second pass is not another full copyedit. It’s a review of your responses and any new additions/changes you made.
  2. Address Remaining Issues: If the editor flags any further issues or queries in this round, address them promptly and clearly.
  3. Confirm Readiness: Once this stage is complete, you should have a clean, precise manuscript ready for the next step (e.g., proofreading, typesetting).

Concrete Example: After you’ve accepted/rejected changes from the first pass, you might accidentally introduce a double space or rephrase a sentence awkwardly. The second pass catches these lingering issues before the manuscript moves to typesetting. The editor might comment: “Found a double space after ‘example’ on page 32. Also, the rephrasing here now creates a passive construction: ‘The report was written by him.’ Consider ‘He wrote the report’ for conciseness.”

Final Considerations: Professionalism, Payment, and Future Engagements

A successful copyediting partnership extends beyond the manuscript itself.

  1. Respect Deadlines and Timelines: Both yours and the editor’s. If you anticipate a delay in returning the manuscript, communicate immediately.
  2. Payment and Contracts: Clarify payment terms, rates (per word, per hour, flat fee), and cancellation policies upfront. A clear contract protects both parties.
  3. Feedback and Appreciation: If you appreciate your copyeditor’s work, let them know. Professional courtesy goes a long way. Consider leaving a testimonial if their work significantly improved your manuscript.
  4. Long-Term Relationship: If you found an editor who aligns with your style and needs, consider them for future projects. A consistent editor who understands your voice can be an invaluable asset over time.
  5. Learn from the Process: The copyedit is an exceptional learning opportunity. Pay attention to the types of changes the editor makes. Do you consistently overuse certain words? Struggle with parallel structure? Fall into passive voice traps? Use the copyedit as a masterclass in refining your own writing skills for the future. Many editors provide an editorial memo summarizing common errors, which is a goldmine for growth.

Concrete Example: After receiving your edited manuscript, you notice your copyeditor consistently changed “very unique” to “unique.” This highlights your tendency to use intensifiers unnecessarily. You make a mental note, or even create a personal checklist, to be mindful of this in your next draft. You also send a thank you note, “Thank you, [Editor’s Name], for your incredibly thorough and insightful work on my manuscript. The clarity and precision you brought to the text are truly remarkable, and I learned so much from your queries and changes. I look forward to working with you again.”

Conclusion

Working with a copyeditor is not a sign of imperfection; it’s a mark of professionalism and a commitment to delivering the best possible version of your work. By understanding their role, meticulously preparing your manuscript, communicating clearly, and engaging thoughtfully with their feedback, you transform a potentially daunting process into a powerful collaborative experience. The copyeditor is your ally, a highly skilled linguistic artisan whose goal is to make your words shine, your message resonate, and your reader’s experience effortlessly immersive. Embrace this partnership, and your writing will not only be correct but truly compelling.