How to Write a Synopisis with a Co-Author

by

How to Write a Synopsis with a Co-Author

The collaborative act of crafting a novel is a delicate dance, but the synopsis, often a dreaded necessity, can become an intricate waltz when shared. Far from a solitary chore, writing a synopsis with a co-author offers unique advantages: shared perspective, deepened analysis, and a more robust final product. However, it also presents distinct challenges, primarily concerning unified vision and equitable contribution. This comprehensive guide will dissect the complex process of co-authoring a synopsis, providing actionable strategies to navigate its intricacies and produce a compelling, unified narrative brief.

The Indispensable Role of the Synopsis in Co-Authored Projects

Before diving into the mechanics of collaboration, it’s crucial to acknowledge the elevated importance of the synopsis in a co-authored work. For a single author, the synopsis is a pitch and a structural check. For co-authors, it’s all of that, plus a shared blueprint, a vital communication tool, and a foundational agreement on the story’s core.

  • Unified Vision Document: It solidifies and articulates the agreed-upon narrative arc, character journeys, and thematic underpinnings, ensuring both authors are rowing in the same direction.
  • Pitching Tool: Agents and publishers need to understand the story from a cohesive perspective, not two disparate viewpoints. A unified synopsis demonstrates your ability to collaborate effectively.
  • Problem Identification: Discrepancies in the synopsis highlight areas where the authors might have differing interpretations of the story, allowing for resolution before extensive drafting occurs.
  • Marketing Foundation: Often, key phrases and plot points from the synopsis will form the basis of marketing copy, website blurbs, and cover descriptions.

Phase 1: Pre-Synopsis Alignment – Laying the Collaborative Foundation

The success of a co-authored synopsis hinges on meticulous preparation. This phase is about establishing a shared understanding and a collaborative framework.

1. Defining the Core Narrative Together

Before a single word of the synopsis is written, both authors must possess an identical, crystal-clear understanding of the story’s fundamentals. This isn’t just about plot points; it’s about the emotional heart, the driving conflicts, and the character transformations.

  • The “Elevator Pitch” Exercise: Each author independently drafts a one-sentence “elevator pitch.” Then, compare, discuss, and synthesize these into a single, agreed-upon pitch. Example: “A cynical detective and a time-displaced magician must unite to prevent a rogue AI from erasing humanity’s memories, forcing them to confront their own forgotten pasts.” This forces conciseness and agreement on the absolute core.
  • Character Arc Mapping (Jointly): For each main character, outline their initial state, inciting incident, defining conflict, key turning points, and final state. Pay close attention to how their arcs intertwine and influence each other. This is critical for showing evolution, which agents love. Example: Instead of “Character A eventually saves the day,” delve into “Character A, initially driven by guilt over a past failure, learns to trust Character B, sacrificing personal vengeance for the greater good, thereby resolving their internal conflict and achieving redemption.”
  • Plot Outline Agreement (High-Level): Focus on the major plot beats: inciting incident, rising action turning points, climax, falling action, and resolution. Use a whiteboard or a shared digital document to map these out. Avoid getting bogged down in minor subplots at this stage. Example: For a murder mystery, the beats might be: “Body found,” “First suspect identified,” “Red herring,” “True killer revealed via clue X,” “Confrontation,” “Aftermath.”
  • Theme Consensus: What overarching messages or inquiries does the story explore? Does it delve into themes of redemption, societal decay, the nature of reality, or familial bonds? Ensure both authors interpret these themes identically. Discrepancies here can lead to vastly different synopses. Example: If one author believes the theme is “the corruption of power” and the other thinks it’s “the resilience of the human spirit,” their synopses will diverge dramatically.

2. Establishing Roles and Responsibilities

While the synopsis is a collaborative effort, a division of labor, even if fluid, can streamline the process.

  • Primary Drafter (with Review Cycle): One author takes the lead on the initial draft, based on the jointly agreed-upon narrative. The other then meticulously reviews, suggesting changes, additions, and deletions. This avoids “too many cooks” syndrome during the initial writing. Example: Author A drafts the first section, Author B reviews; then Author B drafts the next section, Author A reviews.
  • Sectional Specialization: If the novel naturally breaks into distinct sections (e.g., world-building heavy beginning, action-packed middle, character-driven ending), each author could take primary responsibility for drafting the synopsis for their “strongest” section. This requires intense integration later.
  • The “Editor-in-Chief” Role: One author might take on the mantle of final editor, ensuring consistency in tone, voice, and flow throughout the entire document, especially if sections were drafted separately. This requires trust and a thick skin.

3. Choosing Your Collaboration Tools

Effective collaboration requires appropriate tools.

  • Shared Document Platform: Google Docs, Microsoft Word Online, or Scrivener’s compile feature are excellent for simultaneous editing, tracking changes, and commenting. This is non-negotiable for real-time collaboration and version control.
  • Communication Channels: Beyond document comments, establish a dedicated channel for immediate discussion: Slack, Discord, phone calls, or video conferencing. This reduces back-and-forth email chains for quick queries.
  • Version Control: Always save drafts with clear version numbers (e.g., “Synopsis_V1,” “Synopsis_V2_AuthorB_Revisions”). This prevents losing work and helps trace the evolution of the document.

Phase 2: Drafting the Co-Authored Synopsis – The Iterative Process

With the groundwork laid, the actual writing begins. This phase is characterized by iteration, feedback, and mutual respect.

1. The Collaborative Brainstorming Session

Before typing, a dedicated brainstorming session, either in person or via video call, is invaluable.

  • Key Plot Points Recap: Walk through the agreed-upon plot outline again, ensuring no crucial elements are missed or misinterpreted.
  • “What’s the Hook?” Discussion: Jointly determine the strongest, most compelling elements of the story that will grab an agent’s attention. This often includes the unique premise, high stakes, or the central conflict.
  • Character Stakes and Motivation Analysis: How are the characters personally affected by the plot? What do they stand to lose? What drives their actions? This injects emotional depth into the synopsis.
  • Word Count & Tone Discussion: Decide on a target word count (typically 500-800 words, but research specific agent requirements) and the desired tone for the synopsis (e.g., suspenseful, humorous, epic).

2. Drafting – Section by Section, Together

Approach the synopsis not as a monolith but as a sequence of interconnected sections.

  • Opening Paragraph (The Hook): This must be compelling and immediately establish the protagonist, the world, and the inciting incident. Collaborative approach: Each author drafts two versions. Compare, combine the strongest elements, and refine into one powerful opening.
  • Rising Action (Plot Progression): Detail the crucial events that escalate the conflict. Focus on cause and effect. Collaborative approach: One author drafts a section; the other reviews for clarity, pacing, and completeness. Ask: “Is every event here absolutely necessary to move the plot forward?” “Are the stakes clear?”
  • Midpoint Twist/Turning Point: Crucial for showing plot progression. Ensure both authors agree on its exact nature and impact. Collaborative approach: Discuss and define prior to drafting. Each author can then articulate its implications, which are then woven together.
  • Climax (No Spoilers Barred): This is where agents expect to see the full resolution, including the antagonist’s defeat and the protagonist’s ultimate success or failure. Collaborative approach: This often requires the most precise language. Discuss the sequence of events and character actions in detail. Use precise verbs to convey tension and resolution.
  • Falling Action & Resolution (Character Arc Completion): What are the immediate consequences of the climax? How are the character arcs resolved? This demonstrates the story’s thematic payoff. Collaborative approach: Focus on the emotional and thematic resolution as much as the plot. Do the characters end up where you intended? Is the ending satisfying?

3. Integrating Character Arcs and Thematic Elements

The synopsis isn’t merely a plot summary; it’s a character journey and a thematic exploration.

  • Weaving In Character Growth: As you describe plot events, simultaneously reveal how these events impact your characters and drive their internal change. Rather than saying, “Character A does X,” explain why Character A does X and how it reveals their growth or struggle. Example: Instead of “Jane finds the clue,” try “Jane, wrestling with her intrinsic distrust of authority, reluctantly shares the clue, a small but significant step in her journey towards openness.”
  • Subtly Hinting at Theme: Avoid explicitly stating, “The theme of this novel is…” Instead, let the events and character choices implicitly demonstrate the themes. Example: Instead of “This book is about loneliness,” describe a character’s isolation and their subsequent desperate actions to connect, allowing the reader to infer the theme.
  • Narrative Voice Consistency: Even with two authors, the synopsis should read as if a single voice crafted it. This requires careful attention during revisions.

Phase 3: Refining and Perfecting – The Collaborative Polish

Once the draft is complete, the rigorous process of refinement begins. This is where the co-authors truly hone their collaborative editing skills.

1. The Unified Review Process

A structured review process is paramount.

  • Independent Reads (Initial Pass): Each author reads the entire synopsis independently, making notes on clarity, conciseness, plot holes, character inconsistencies, and areas needing expansion or reduction. Focus on the “flow” and whether it tells a complete story.
  • The “Agent” Read: Swap roles. Read the synopsis as if you are an agent encountering it for the first time. Are you hooked? Do you understand the stakes? Does it make you want to read the manuscript? Be brutally honest.
  • Annotated Feedback Session: Schedule a dedicated session (video call preferred) to go through the synopsis line by line. Each author presents their notes and suggestions. Discuss every point until a mutually agreeable solution is found. Avoid “my idea vs. your idea”; focus on “what serves the story best.”
  • Checklist Review (Jointly): Use a pre-defined checklist to ensure all essential elements are present and polished.
    • Is the protagonist’s goal clear?
    • Are the stakes explicit?
    • Is the antagonist effectively portrayed (if applicable)?
    • Is the major conflict well-defined?
    • Are the turning points evident?
    • Is the ending revealed and satisfying?
    • Is the pacing effective?
    • Is the language strong, concise, and active?
    • Are there any redundancies or unnecessary details?

2. Addressing Discrepancies and Compromising Effectively

Disagreements during the refinement phase are inevitable. How you handle them defines your collaborative success.

  • Fact-Based Arguments: When discussing changes, ground your arguments in the manuscript itself. “This scene in Chapter 5 directly contradicts this synopsis point” is more effective than “I just don’t like it.”
  • The “Why” Question: When one author suggests a change, the other should ask, “Why do you think that change is necessary?” Understanding the motivation behind a suggestion can lead to quicker resolution.
  • Trial and Error: If you can’t agree on phrasing for a specific sentence or paragraph, try drafting both versions and reading them aloud. Sometimes, listening reveals the stronger option.
  • The “Tie-Breaker” Clause: In extreme cases, if a significant impasse occurs, have an agreed-upon method for breaking ties. This could be deferring to the author who wrote the original scene, or if an impartial third party (trusted critique partner) could offer input (sparingly, as external input can complicate team dynamics). Example: “If we can’t agree after two rounds of discussion, the author whose character is most affected by this plot point makes the final call.”
  • Compromise and Concession: Collaboration is about valuing the shared goal over individual preference. Be prepared to compromise on smaller points to achieve a strong overall product. Example: “I prefer this phrasing, but your version is clearer for new readers, so let’s go with yours.”

3. Cutting and Condensing – A Joint Effort

Synopses are short. Every word must earn its place.

  • Eliminate Redundancy: Look for phrases or sentences that repeat information.
  • Active Voice & Strong Verbs: Transform passive voice into active, and weak verbs into powerful ones. Example: “The decision was made by her” becomes “She decided.” “He walked quickly” becomes “He sprinted.”
  • Cut Adverbs and Adjectives: Often, powerful nouns and verbs render descriptive words superfluous.
  • Focus on the Main Arc: Remove subplots or character details that aren’t absolutely critical to understanding the central story. If a character or event doesn’t directly impact the main protagonist’s journey or the core conflict, it likely doesn’t belong in the synopsis.

Phase 4: Finalization and Beyond – Maintaining Synchronization

The synopsis is complete, but the collaborative journey continues.

1. The Signed-Off Version

  • Final Read-Through (Aloud): Read the entire synopsis aloud together. This often reveals awkward phrasing, repetitive sentences, or missing words that are easily missed during silent reading.
  • Proofreading: Don’t skip this. Typos and grammatical errors undermine professionalism. Run it through grammar checkers, but also manually proofread.
  • Official “Signed-Off” Draft: Label the final version clearly. This is the official document for submission. Both authors should formally agree that this version is complete and ready.

2. Using the Synopsis as a Living Document

The synopsis isn’t just for agents; it’s a valuable internal tool.

  • Referencing During Revisions: As you revise the manuscript, periodically refer back to the synopsis. Are you staying true to the core narrative you pitched? Has anything diverged significantly?
  • Maintaining Consistency: If one author works on a specific section of the manuscript, periodically check the synopsis to ensure consistency in character motivation, plot points, and world-building.
  • Future Projects: The collaborative process developed during synopsis writing can be applied to future projects, making subsequent co-authored endeavors smoother.

Key Success Factors for Co-Authoring a Synopsis

Beyond the step-by-step process, certain underlying principles guarantee a smoother, more effective co-authored synopsis.

  • Open and Honest Communication: This is the bedrock. Voice concerns, express disagreements respectfully, and don’t let issues fester.
  • Mutual Respect: Acknowledge and value each other’s contributions, strengths, and perspectives. Your co-author brings a unique lens to the story.
  • Shared Ownership: Both authors must feel equally invested in the synopsis’s success and its representation of their combined work. It’s “our synopsis,” not “my synopsis.”
  • Flexibility and Adaptability: Be prepared to adjust your initial ideas in light of your co-author’s input. The final product will be stronger for it.
  • Focus on the Story, Not Ego: The ultimate goal is to create the best possible synopsis that effectively sells your joint novel. Personal preferences should always take a backseat to narrative strength and clarity.
  • Defined Arbitration: For persistent disagreements, having an agreed-upon arbitration method (even if rarely used) provides a safety net and reduces anxiety.
  • Celebrate Small Wins: Acknowledge milestones – agreeing on the hook, completing a section, finalizing a draft. Positive reinforcement strengthens the partnership.

Conclusion

Co-authoring a synopsis, while seemingly daunting, is a powerful exercise in collaborative storytelling. It compels writers to articulate their shared narrative with precision, iron out conceptual inconsistencies, and refine their collective vision long before the agent receives the submission. By meticulously preparing, embracing iterative drafting, and committing to rigorous, respectful critique, co-authors can transform the often-arduous task of synopsis writing into another triumph in their shared creative journey. The resulting document is not merely a summary; it’s a testament to a unified creative force, ready to launch their story into the world.